3. Persoalan Kajian/ Objektif Kajian (Bab1) #JomTulisTesis
Bab 1, 1.4. Kalau kita tengok di sini, 1.4
Persoalan kajian dan objektif kajian 1.5. Jadi kita ambil persoalan kajian.
Okay. Jadi persoalan kajian dengan objektif kajian perlulah sejajar. Okay.
Perlu sejajar. Kerana ia berkaitan. Jadi sekarang ini, contoh, kita ambil
contoh yang ini. Persoalan kajian. Tengok beza sini. Mengenal pasti wacana tekstual
skrip animasi cerita rakyat Melayu. Ini objektif dia. Apakah wacana tekstual
skrip animasi cerita rakyat Melayu. Jadi ini kalau misalnya objektif dia dan
persoalan dia ini ada satu. Jadi persoalan dia teruslah. Maknanya kita boleh
faham dah. Tapi kalau contohnya “menganalisis kesan skrip animasi cerita rakyat
Melayu dalam kalangan pelajar sekolah”, kita boleh jadi dua soalan daripada
satu objektif iaitu “Sejauh manakah kesan skrip animasi cerita rakyat Melayu
dalam kalangan pelajar sekolah rendah?” “ Bagaimanakah pelajar memberi pendapat
menerusi skrip animasi cerita rakyat Melayu?”. Jadi kedua-dua soalan ini
sebenarnya akan menjawab objektif dua. Kena ingat ya. Apa sahaja dalam objektif
ini kita kena persoalkan semula. Sebab kita nak tahu bahawa sejauh mana kesan
itu. Bagaimana cara dia? Jadi itu akan menjawab objektif ini. Jadi bila kita
analisis data ini, memang ini akan terjawab. Okay. Serupa juga, macam contohnya
“ Menghasilkan repertoir perbualan melalui animasi cerita rakyat Melayu dalam
kalangan pelajar sekolah rendah. Yang ini sebenarnya ada temu bual. Temu bual
dalam kalangan pelajar sekolah rendah tentang skrip animasi tersebut. Jadi, dia
bagi pendapat. Jadi, persoalannya “Sejauh manakah repertoir dibina melalui ini
ini ini”. Bagaimana? Dan apakah cara perbualan? Jadi ini terjawablah dalam tu.
Bagaimana. Apakah cara perbualan dia? Adakah dia cara perbualan dia memang
berdua atau bertiga atau berempat. Ataupun memang dia duduk, dia sorang. Tapi
nak kata seorang, dia nak berbual dengan siapa pula. Okay. Mungkin dengan penyelidik.
Soalan ketiga “Apakah kategori repertoir?” Jadi maknanya dia hasilkan
repertoir, ada tiga soalan di sini. Sejauh manakah? Apakah cara perbualan?
Apakah kategori dia? Memang setelah itu nanti bila kita menganalisis data,
memang kita akan dapati akan terjawablah soalan ketiga-tiga ini. Jadi, bukanlah
semestinya, satu objektif, satu. Boleh juga satu objektif, tiga soalan. Tapi
sebenarnya, bila kita analisis data, memang akan terjawab tiga-tiga soalan ini.
Macam yang nombor 2, analisis kesan skrip animasi akan ada dua persoalan. Bila
kita analisis memang kita jawablah dua soalan ini. Macam itu. Kita dapati
bahawa memang kita jawab dua-dua soalan ini. Bila yang objektif satu “Mengenal
pasti wacana tekstual” memang kita akan ada satu. Contohnya. Boleh juga nak
buat dua. Tapi kita tengoklah cara kita analisis data itu terjawab tak soalan
ini. Bila kita buat analisis, kita tengok balik soalan. Terjawab tak? Jadi bila
dah terjawab tu memang betullah. Jadi, janganlah kita letak semua tiga-tiga
objektif atau semua dua-dua objektif, semua ada satu sahaja soalan. Jadi kita
boleh letak dua atau tiga. Kadang-kadang ada pelajar ada letak sampai empat.
Sebab dia nak pastikan bahawa bila dia analisis data itu, memang terjawab
empat-empat soalan tersebut. Kalau contohnya “Menghasilkan buku panduan
penulisan skrip animasi cerita rakyat”. Contohnya, kalaulah pelajar itu buat
ada empat objektif,. Jadi sejauh manakah buku panduan penulisan skrip animasi cerita
rakyat dihasilkan. Apakah cara untuk menghasilkan buku panduan skrip animasi
cerita rakyat? Jadi, yang ini memang ini akan jadi kebaharuan. Yang nombor
ketiga, keempat kebaharuan bagi awak punya tesis. Benda baharu yang kita nak
sebarkan ke seluruh dunia. Jadi yang ini kita akan ada dua persoalan di sini.
Sejauh manakah buku panduan dihasilkan? Apakah cara dia? Jadi bila buat ini
memang kita pastikan bila kita analisis data, kita pastikan data kita terjawab
dua-dua soalan ini. Jadi bila kita nak tulis, objektif, kita pastikan, kita
persoalkan. Apa benda yang kita akan dapati. Bila kita analisis data nanti.
Adakah ini? Adakah itu? Jadi sebab itulah kita ada beberapa soalan untuk satu
objektif. Ini ada dua soalan untuk satu objektif. Ini ada tiga soalan. Ini ada
ini. Tapi soalan dia memang berkisarkan tentang objektif ini tadi. Tak lari.
Tak lari. Tetapi memang ini sebagai penyelidik yang bagus, memang akan
persoalkan supaya nanti bila kita macam ini “ Dibina repertoir, sejauh mana
repertoi dibina?” Lepas itu, apakah cara perbualan dia. Cara perbualan dia itu
kita kena huraikanlah. Apakah kategori? Sebab kita nak kategorikan repertoir
tersebut. Untuk objektif ketiga ini. Jadi kita pastikan kita jawab semua soalan
ini ya. Jadi, pelajar semua, harap bila kita dah lihat apakah objektif kita,
kita pastikan bahawa persoalan kita itu menjawab soalan. Menjawab melalui
objektif kita. Dan kita kena pastikan bahawa semula saya katakan bahawa apa
yang kita analisis akan terjawablah soalan-soalan yang kita tanya. Pada diri
kita. Persoalan ini. Dan pemeriksa bila dia baca, oh okay. Soalan dia begini,
memang saya dapati ada dalam bab 4. Okay soalan dia begini, okay kita memang
dapati bahawa memang pelajar tulis dalam kategori. Kategori repertoir itu. Dah
bagi repertoir. Bermakna memang tesis ini berjaya. Sebab dia boleh menjawab
persoalan daripada objektif yang telah dia cadangkan untuk tesis dia. Jadi
pastikan bahawa, 1.4 persoalan kajian, 1.5 objektif. Perkataan ini. Perkataan
ini yang diambil. Ini. Seperti ini. Mengenal pasti, menganalisis, menghasilkan.
Ini ada dalam sini. Kalau kita dapat lihat, awak kena pastikan bahawa objektif
satu yang awak pilih itu, perlulah dari. Kalau kita lihat di sini. Kejap. Saya
ada cadangkan ia di sini. Cadangan senarai kata kerja. Ini ya. Kata kerja
operasional taksonomi Bloom. Jadi, kita pastikan objektif satu itu rendah.
Okay. Kalau C1 itu, dia rendah. Rendah. Macam tadi mengenal pasti ada ya.
Mengenal pasti. Kemudian, bila objektif 2, kita nak analisis. Kena yang tinggi.
Kena kita tinggi. Kita tengoklah mana yang bersesuai. Kita baca dulu. Yang mana
kita bersesuai untuk objektif kedua. Kalau untuk aplikasi, apa dia. Untuk
analisis, apa dia. Ini kita tadi pilih untuk objektif kedua, analisis. Itu dah
tinggi. Dah C4. Maknanya kita memang analisis, analisis secara mendalam. Secara
mendalam. Kemudian, kita nak letakkan menghasilkan itu. Kita letak C6. Kita nak
hasilkan tadi kan. Ingat tak kita nak hasilkan repertoir atapun kita nak
hasilkan buku panduan ke apa ke. Itu perkataan-perkataan dia. Jadi, ini
pastikan bahawa janganlah objektif 1 satu awak ambik C5, awak nak nilai.
Tiba-tiba objektif 2 rendah pula. Awak masuk pula mengenal pasti. Dah salah.
Dia mesti daripada kecil, daripada mudah. Ini dikira mudah. Hinggalah kita
naik-naik sehinggalah ke C6. Jadi pastikan pemilihan perkataan-perkataan ini,
yang bersesuaian dengan objektif. Bersesuai. Dan juga ikut tahap dia. Rendah ke
tinggi. Objektif 1 rendah, objektif 2 tinggi sikit, objektif 3 lagi tinggi.
Janganlah objektif satu rendah, objektif 2 awak letak okay tinggi betul. C6
tadi. Kemudian objektif tiga awak turun pula balik. Salah. Kena ikut tingkat. Macam
kita naik tangga. Rendah, naik, naik. Jadi ambil daripada sini. Pastikan bahawa
perkataan itu bersesuaian dengan objektif kita. Jadi kena bersesuai. Dan lagi
satu. Lagi satu, bila kita tulis objektif ini. Contoh mengenal pasti. Ada pula
pelajar nombor 2 mengenal pasti juga. Kemudian nombor 3, mengenal pasti lagi.
Nombor 4 mengenal pasti. Dah empat-empat mengenal pasti. Jadi itu tak boleh.
Itu semuanya tahap yang rendah. Tahap yang rendah ini tidak bersesuaian. Asyik
nak mengenal pasti saja. Dah kenapa kan. Kita nak juga analisis. Jadi tak
boleh. Jadi macam ini, yang saya bagi contoh ini kalau dia buat empat objektif.
Biasanya objektif ada tiga sahaja. Kalau ada empat pun, kalau yang ini dia
hasilkan repertoir, ini buku panduan. Ini berbeza. Jadi, bolehlah dia nak
tukar. Contohnya menghasilkan. Jadi dia boleh nak tukar. Kalau kita tengok
sini. Ada banyak. Kita ada. Mengatur, mengkategorikan, menyusun, membangun. Ada
banyaklah. Merencana, merumuskan pun boleh. Kita letak ini merumus. Jadi kalau
misalnya ini sudah C6. Bolehlah C6 ini, C6 yang ini. Jadi boleh rujuk dalam
buku ini. Kalau tidak ada pun boleh rujuk dekat internet. Kalau jumpa. Okay.
Pastikan ya. Ingat. Saya katakan tadi. Saya ulang balik. Pastikan kategori dia
daripada rendah, kemudian tinggi sikit, kemudian tinggi lagi. Okay. Supaya
nampak dia punya perbezaan. Cara kita nak menganalisis data tersebut. Jadi
pemilihan perkataan ini amat penting dalam penulisan objektif kajian.
3. Research Questions / Research Objectives (Chapter 1) #JomTulisTesis
Chapters 1, 1.4.
If we look here, 1.4 Research questions and objectives of study 1.5. So we take
the research question. Okay. So the research questions with the research
objectives need to be aligned. Okay. Needs to be aligned. Because it is
related. So now, for example, let's take this example. Research questions. Look
at the difference here. Identifying the textual discourse animation script
Malay folklore. This is her/his objective. Is animation script textual
discourse Malay folklore. So this is if for example, his/her objective and his/her
question there is one. So the question he/she continues. That means we can
understand. But if for example "analyze the impact of the animation script
Malay folklore among elementary school students", it can be objectives 2,
namely the question of "How much effect animation script Malay folklore
among elementary school students?" "How do students give opinions
through animation script Malay folklore?". So these two questions will
actually answer objective 2. Remember. Whatever is in this objective we have to
question again. Because we want to know the extent of the effect. How is it? So
that will answer this objective. So if we analyze this data, indeed this will
be answered. Okay. Similarly, the example of "Produce repertoire animated
conversation through the Malay folklore among elementary school students. This
one is actually an interview. Interviews among primary school students about
the animated script. So, he/she shared his/her opinion. So, the question is
"To what extent is the repertoire built through this and this". How?
And what is the way of conversation? So this is answered in there. How. How
does he/she talk? Is the way he/she talks he/she is indeed two or three or
four. Or indeed he/she is sitting, he/she is alone. But one person wants to
say, he/she wants to talk to someone else. Okay. Probably with researchers. The
third question is "What is the category of repertoire?" So that means
he /she created a repertoire, there are three questions here. How far? What is
the way of conversation? What is it category? Indeed, after that when we
analyze the data, we will find that these three questions will be answered. So,
not necessarily, one objective, one. Can also be one objective, three
questions. But in fact, when we analyze the data, these three questions will be
answered. As in number 2, the analysis of the effects of the animated script
will have two questions. When we analyze, we answer these two questions. Like
that. We find that we do answer these two questions. When the objective of one
is "Identifying textual discourse" we will have one. For example. Can
also make two. But let's look at the way we analyze the data to answer this
question. When we do analysis, we look back at the question. Did you answer? So
when it is answered, it is true. So, let's not put all three objectives or all
two objectives, all there is only one question. So we can put two or three. Sometimes
there are students write up to four. Because he/she wants to make sure that
when he/she analyzes the data, the four questions are answered. If for example
"Produce a guidebook for writing animated scripts of folk tales". For
example, if the student makes four objectives. So to what extent are folklore
animated script writing handbooks produced. What is the way to produce a
folklore animated script guidebook? So, this one is indeed going to be a
novelty. The third number, the fourth novelty for you to have a thesis. New
things we want to spread all over the world. So this one we will have two
questions here. To what extent is the handbook produced? What is it way? So
when we do this we make sure when we analyze the data, we make sure our data is
answered these two questions. So when we want to write, objective, we make
sure, we question. What things will we find. When we analyze the data later. Is
this? Is that? So that is why we have several questions for one objective. Here
are two questions for one objective. Here are three questions. Here it is. But
his/her question really revolves around this objective just now. Align. Align.
But indeed as a good researcher, will indeed question so that later when we are
like this "Built repertoire, how
far is repertoire built?" After
that, what is the way he/she talks. We have to explain the way he/she talks.
What is it category? Because we want to categorize the repertoire. For this
third objective. So we make sure we answer all these questions. So, all
students, please when we have seen what our objectives are, we make sure that
our questions answer the questions. Answer through our objectives. And we have
to make sure that again I say that what we analyze will answer the questions we
ask. On ourselves. This question. And the examiner when he reads, oh okay. His
question is like this, indeed I found it in chapter 4. Okay his question is
like this, okay we did find that indeed students write in categories. The
repertoire category. Already for the repertoire. Meaning this thesis is
successful. Because he can answer questions from the objectives he has proposed
for his thesis. So make sure that, 1.4 research questions, 1.5 objectives. This
word. This word is taken. Here. Like this. Identify, analyze, produce. It's in
here. If we can see, you have to make sure that the objective one you choose,
must be from. If we look here. Wait. I have suggested it here. Suggested verb
list. Here it is. Bloom's taxonomic operational verbs. So, we make sure the
objective one is low. Okay. If it's C1, it's low. Low. Like just identifying.
Identify. Then, when objective 2, we want analysis. It’s high. We have to
choose the high one. Let's see which one fits. We read first. Which fit for the
second objective. If for the application, what is it. For analysis, what is it.
This, we just chose for the second objective, analysis. That's high. Already C4.
That means we are indeed analysis, in-depth analysis. Deeply. Then, we want to put that produce.
Located C6. We want to produce just now, right? Remember we do not want
to produce a repertoire or we want to produce a guidebook to what. Those are
his words. So, this makes sure that you do not have objective 1 with C5, you
have to exam it. Suddenly objective 2 is lower than objective 1. You choose
identify. Wrong. It,s must be from lower level, from simple. This is considered
easy. Until we go up and up all the way to C6. So make sure the selection of
these words, which corresponds to the objective. Suitable. And also follow its
level. Low to high. Objective 1 low, objective 2 slightly higher, objective 3
more high. Don't let objective one be low, objective 2 you place okay high
right. C6 earlier. Then the objective of the three of you goes back down.
Wrong. Must follow the level. Like we went up the stairs. Low, up, up. So take
it from here. Make sure that the word fits our objective. Have to adapt. And
one more. One more thing, when we write this objective. Examples identify.
There are also number 2, students identifying as well. Then number 3, identify
again. Number 4 identifY. The four have identifY. So that can't be. That's all
low level. This low level is not appropriate. It's all to identify. Why? We
also want analysis. So you can't. So like this, I give this example if he makes
four objectives. Usually there are only three objectives. If there are four, if
this one he produced repertoire, this is a guidebook. This is different. So,
let’s change. For example produce. So he/she can change. If we look here. There
are many. We have. Organize, categorize, organize, build. There are many.
Planning, formulating is also possible. We put this formulating. So if for
example this is already C6. Let this C6, this C6. So can refer in this book. If
there is none, you can refer to the internet. Up to you. Okay. Make sure.
Remember. I said earlier. I repeat. Keep it category from low, then a little
high, then high again. Okay. To see that it has a difference. The way we can
analyze the data. So the selection of these words is very important in writing
the objectives of the study.
Pautan video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lTV4bXMeYcw
Bukti subscribe:
Rujukan:
Normaliza
Abd Rahim (2019). Jom Tulis Tesis!. Selangor: Penerbit Universiti Putra
Malaysia
No comments:
Post a Comment