BBN3402SATU2020: MINGGU11 TERJEMAHAN VIDEO(9)

 

Teks Asal Video 9a. Keputusan dan perbincangan (Bab 4) – Analisis Bentuk Jadual – 1 #JomTulis Tesis

Okay sekarang kita pergi kepada bab 4. Bab 4 ini sebenarnya bab yang dikatakan bab kajian penulisan awak sendiri. Apa yang telah awak kaji selama bertahun-tahun inilah hasilnya. Dalam bab 4 ini jika dilihat dalam buku Jom Tulis Tesis, kita ada pengenalan, analisis objektif 1, 2, 3, rumusan dan kesimpulan. Kalau kita tengok sekarang, sebagai contoh, kalau kita berbalik kepada kajian kita yang tadi iaitu kajian wacana tekstual skrip animasi cerita rakyat melayu, 4.1 pengenalan. Seperti biasa pengenalan kita nak memperkenalkan apa yang ada dalam bab ini. Jangan keliru ya. Sebab ada kebiasaan pelajar letak pengenalan dengan ada rujukan sekali. Itu sangat tidak perlu. Pengenalan ini kita hanya nak memperkenalkan apa yang ada dalam bab itu. Jangan letak ada rujukan kerana dah jadi seperti bab 2 iaitu ada sorotan kajian. Pengenalan satu perenggan sahaja. Pengenalan tu 4.1. 4.2 kita dah mula untuk melihat balik kepada objektif kita.

Objektif yang pertama mengenal pasti wacana  tekstur skrip animasi cerita rakyat Melayu. Tajuk kita ini kita ambil pada objektif, jadi kita terus kepada wacana tekstual skrip animasi cerita rakyat Melayu. Ini tajuk dia. Dalam tajuk ini awak akan letak terus kepada tajuk bukannya ada kata kerja untuk tajuk itu. Sekarang ini apabila awak dah ambil tajuk ini, awak akan menggunakan teori. Teori itu dah ada kita bincang pada bab 3 tadi. Kalau kita nak analisis kita perlu ada teori kerana kita nak berpegang kepada sesuatu. Kalau tak ada teori ibarat kita longgar. Bila kita tak ada huraian teori analisis kita jadi salah. Sebagai contoh kita akan guna teori, iaitu teori analisis wacana yang dicadangkan oleh. Kejap ye contoh saya cuba tunjukkan. Contohnya kita ambil teori analisis wacana oleh Normaliza Abd Rahim (2019). Teori Analisis Wacana Normaliza Abd Rahim (2019) terbahagi kepada tiga elemen iaitu:

	Teori Analisis Wacana Normaliza Abd Rahim (2019)
Kandungan	Konteks	Andaian
Tema	Tatabahasa	Pendapat
	Latar	Perujukan
	Emosi	persoalan

 

Seterusnya kita pergi terus ke 4.2.1 iaitu kandungan. Kita kena tulis terus apa elemen dekat dalam tajuk. Masukkan lima bukti. Contohnya awak dah ada sistem untuk coding. Awak ambil lebih kurang 30 skrip animasi. Masukkan nombor untuk skrip animasi itu. Contoh jadi sk yang merujuk kepada skrip. Jadi awak akan ada sk satu sampai tiga puluh. Jadi daripada semua contoh itu awak ambil lima sahaja. Yang selebihnya awak masukkan ke dalam lampiran sahaja. Jadi sekarang, contohnya awak letak sk 10, sk 13, sk 20, sk 23. Yang ini awak boleh letakkan sebagai jadual 1: Tema kekeluargaan. Sebab awak sendiri sudah kenal pasti daripada 30 skrip itu akan ada contohnya 5 tema. Daripada tema itu dan tema-tema lain awak dapati skrip yang lima itu nampak menyerlah. Awak ambil skrip 10 dan letak tema apa.  Awak kena pastikan bahawa dari segi macam mana tema kekeluargaan itu ada. Kerana cerita rakyat ini kadang-kadang dari segi kekeluargaan itu macam pipit dan cenderawasih itu ada hubungan. Awak letak dia punya watak misal kata cenderawasih dan anaknya. Sk 13 apa watak yang menunjukkan kekeluargaan tersebut. Kemudian di bawah jadual tersebut awak buat sedikit huraian.

Jadual itu awak huraikan satu persatu dan jelaskan tentang tema kekeluargaan itu. Macam mana yang menunjukkan tema kekeluargaan tersebut. Disebabkan itu awak perlu ambil ayat daripada skrip tersebut. Dan sebut sebagai bukti ayat ini menunjukkan kekeluargaan. Misal kata cenderawasih sudah memberi anaknya makan dengan penuh kasih sayang. Ayat dalam skrip itu menunjukkan tema kekeluargaan. Setelah awak kenal pasti tema itu awak perlu berikan pendapat awak pula. Kenapa awak rasa perkara itu menunjukkan kekeluargaan. Misal kata penghulu dengan anaknya di rumah. Contoh pengail ikan. Pastikan awak sertakan contoh sekali. Awak boleh tulis seperti ini “Hal ini berkemungkinan”. Sebab ini pendapat awak. Jadi gunakan perkataan “Hal ini berkemungkinan burung cenderawasih seekor burung yang sangat penyayang terhadap anaknya. Hal ini kerana, burung cenderawasih sentiasa berada di sisi anaknya”. Huraikan sehingga habis. Dan teruskan dengan jadual yang kedua dengan tema yang seterusnya. Serupa juga awak perlu letakkan huraiai. Huraian itu bukan dalam satu perenggan. Kebiasaannya dalam dua perenggan. Pisahkan supaya tak jadi banyak halaman.

Untuk kandungan sahaja awak akan ada lima jadual untuk tema sahaja. Ini sudah 5 jadual belum lagi masuk yang kedua iaitu ‘konteks’. Jadi untuk 4.2.2 baru masuk konteks.  Seperti biasa mesti huraikan dulu apa itu konteks menurut Normaliza Abd Rahim (2019) apa-apa. Huraikan apa itu konteks. Kemudian barulah awak bahagikan kepada tatabahasa, latar, dan emosi. Jadi menurut teori ini seperti tatabahasa itu. Tatabahasa ini sangat luas. Jadi terpulang kepada pelajar untuk memilih 3 tatabahasa sahaja. Terpulang kepada teks itu. Kalau awak rasa ini banyak atau yang itu banyak terpulang. Di sini nanti awak perlu huraikan apa maksud kandungan menurut teori yang awak pilih. Yang ini, disebabkan elemen konteks ada tiga. Kalau tatabahasa ini sangat luas. Jadi terpulanglah kepada pelajar untuk pilih tiga untuk setiap elemen. Jadi sekarang, kalau awak rasa bahagian elemen itu banyak yang itu lah awak jadikan sebagai kajian. Contohnya latar ini boleh jadi latar masa, tempat, dan masyarakat. Emosi pula boleh jadi emosi positif dan emosi negatif.

Sekarang ini sistem penomboran perlu betul. Jadi 4.2.2.1 akan masuk tatabahasa. Dalam tatabahasa huraikan dahulu apa itu tatabahasa. Menurut siapa-siapa. Akhir ayat itu awak sebutkan balik kajian ini berfokus kepada tiga elemen sahaja. Kemudian baru pecahkan kepada bawah lagi. Contohnya bawah tatabahasa ada tiga point-point kecil. Jika ada subtopik awak perlu huraikan. Dan selesai semua baru masukkan data. Semua jadual dalam tesis perlu ada garisan yang melintang sahaja. Garisan menegak tidak perlu ada. Jadual dan awak huraikan. Tadi jadual dah sampai 5 sekarang mesti jadual 6. Untuk tatabahasa ada tiga, jadi awak boleh ada tiga untuk subtopik. Jadi akan ada tiga jadual. Tiga jadual untuk tatabahasa, tiga untuk jadual  latar iaitu latar masa, tempat, masyarakat. Jadual enam di atas sebagai ayat depan sebelum huraian jadual itu. Kena tulis jadual itu sama ada di bahagian bawah atau di abahagian atas. Disebabkan itulah sistem penomboran untuk bab 4 amat penting. Kena letak jadual dan huraian di bahagian bawah.

Jadi, perlu menggunakan elemen pertama dan elemen kedua Teori Analisis Wacana. Objektif ketiga pula pakai teori lain iaitu Teori Andaian. Jadi sekarang ini, habis je kandungan dah siap, bermakna konteks dah siap. Maka siaplah objektif 1. Setelah itu perlu letak rumusan objektif 1. Rumusan kandungan dan juga konteks. Rumusan perlu dalam satu perenggan. Perlu disokong kajian daripada dalam bab 2. Kemudian kita kena sokong dengan teori. Misal kata disokong dengan Teori Analisis Wacana oleh Normaliza Abd Rahim. Misalnya kajian ini selari atau hampir sama dengan Teori Analisis Wacana. Perkataan-perkataan ini anda perlu pilih dan mesti bersesuaian dengan Teori Analisis Wacana itu. Tetapi perlu ingat sokongan kajian, perlulah kajian daripada jumlah lima tahun yang lepas yang terkini sahaja. Pastikan lima tahun sahaja. Kalau sekaranga 2020, jadi tahun terkini ialah lima tahun kebelakang bermakna habis sehingga 2016 sahaja. Kajian wacana selalunya banyak dilakukan sejak dahulu lagi. Kita perlu ambil yang terkini supaya kajian kita lebih berkualiti.

Itu baru rumusan objektif 1. Belum lagi objektif 2. Jadi maknanya dekat sini kesan. Jangan tulis analisis. Ayat yang awak dapat daripada atas itu. Kemudian barulah awak letak andaian dan huraikan sedikit apa maksud andaian menurut siapa-siapa. Kemudian dah masuk andaian itu barulah kita nak masuk pendapat. Ini ialah sub-topik untuk pendapat. Jadi huraikan dahulu. Menurut Normaliza Abd Rahim pendapat itu ialah. Pendapat itu apa dia. Setelah itu barulah ada jadual ini. Setiap satu itu awak boleh beri dia punya bukti daripada perbualan kanak-kanak itu tadi. Di sini juga awak perlu pakai sistem coding bahasa. Ini bukan sistem computer science. Sekarang kita perlu ambil sampel kerana sekarang dah sampai bahagian kita perlu temu bual. Macam tadi awak perlu buat keputusan sendiri coding awak nak jadi banyak mana. Semua data-data yang diperoleh ini perlu diletakkan dekat belakang dekat lampiran. Ada ayat yang tidak menunjukkan perujukan, persoalan, dan sebagainya. Jadi awak perlu pilih yang mana sesuai sahaja. Di akhirnya juga jangan lupa yang kita perlu letak rumusan. Rumuskan balik tentang dapatan daripada objektif dua. Dan ingat rumusan itu perlu disokong dengan kajian lima tahun ke belakang sahaja. Kemudian sokong dengan teori. Perkara itu mesti ada. Daripada keputusan kajian kita akan sokong dengan teori. Akhirnya ialah 4.4 barulah kesimpulan. Dalam kesimpulan saya jelaskan lagi sekali. Ayat akhir perlu ceritakan apa yang ada dalam bab seterusnya. Supaya ada kesinambungan dalam bab 4 dan bab 5. Ayat akhir bab seterusnya bla...bla...bla... Yang ini tentang rumusan habis daripada huraian rumusan. Ada pensyarah yang tidak mahu letak rumusan di akhir setelah kita analisis. Tiap-tiap huraian perlu disokong. Bagi saya muda sahaja. Apa yang kita rumuskan kita perlu ulang dan kita sokong. Sama juga kalau kita letak dalam tu. Kadang-kadang saya dapai ada pelajar yang dia memang sokong setiap kali dia hurai. Hurai tentang pendapat misalnya dia akan sokong dengan teori sentiasa. Saya tengok ayat dia sama dan apa yang disokong pun orang yang sama. Benda itu seolah-olah macam tak ada usaha dia untuk buat ayat yang berbeza. Jadi pastikan di sini ayat mestilah berbeza dengan ayat di atas. Yang ini penting untuk rumuskan keputusan kajian yang telah kita peroleh. Untuk bab 4 ini oleh kerana kita ada dua objektif. Ingat ye bab 4 ini kita punya dan kita yang analisis. Kita memang berbeza dengan orang lain. Ini la usaha kita untuk temu bual orang. Kita tunggu luar pagar. Walaupun kita sebenarnya kena ambil kebenaran. Ada masa kita salah bawa surat kebenaran. Kita kena bertabah jadi penyelidik ini. Contohnya daripada objektif 1 ini 40 halaman untuk halaman untuk objektif 1 sahaja. Master 80. Phd 120. Setiap halaman ini perlulah seimbang. Awak perlu seimbang untuk setiap objektif bagi menyediakan dapatan. Misal kata jumlah 60 muka surat. Jadi mesti seimbang jumlah setiap muka surat untuk setiap objektif. Jadi janganlah tiba-tiba objektif ketiga jadi kurang muka surat. Biasanya objektif ketiga itu penting. Kalau nak lari sikit pun boleh la. Misalnya objektif 1 41 muka surat, objektif 2 43 muka surat. Objektif 3 pula terlebih jadi 43 muka surat. Kalau macam itu bolehlah. Kalau tak seimbang jauh sangat baik tak perlu ada objektif banyak-banyak. Kalau macam tu tak tahu dah la saya nak kata apa. Baik awak buat universiti sendiri je kalau tak nak dengar arahan. Ingat ye bab 4 ini kita punya. Dalam setiap tesis perlu ada penanda wacana. Kalau tidak ada tak jadilah penulisan akademik. Penanda wacana kalau tengok buku Jom Tulis Tesis ada beberapa penanda wacana yang telah saya senaraikan. Awak boleh rujuk. Pelajar suka betul penanda wacana oleh itu. Oleh itu la pelajar suka guna setiap kali buat penulisan. Tak faham betul saya. Ada beratus ratus penanda wacana dalam ni. Gunakanlah sebaiknya. Bila kita baca tesis tu alah sejuknya hati bila baca tesis ini. Jadi gunakan penanda wacana. Tetapi ada masalah pula. Ada pelajar ini tesis ni saya baca. Memang dia pakai penanda wacana tu memang sangat bagus. Tak tahu la mungkin ambil daripada buku saya ini. Tetapi bila kita tengok mesti tak jadi. Sebab apa. Sebab tak kena dengan ayat. Memang perkataan itu memang tidak pernah didengar oleh masyarakat. Contohnya, penanda wacana namun demikian suatu hakikat yang tidak boleh dikesampingkan ialah bla... bla... blaa. Itu untuk ayat pertama okaylah tu. Tiba-tiba ayat seterusnya dah tak betul dah. Apa benda yang dibuat olehnya. Tak kena dengan pemilihan penanda wacana itu. Maka adalah wajar untuk pelajar menggunakan penanda wacana yang betul. Dan pelbagaikan. Janganlah asyik gunakan penanda wacana oleh itu sampai la akhir bab tesis. Peringatan kepada pelajar la ni. Jadi saya rasa bab 4 ini dah okay jadi jika saya dah terangkan dengan jelas ini. Penggunaan jadual-jadual ini ingat ye. Kalau boleh jangan buat salah dekat jadual. Jangan tulis jadual 4.1 jadual 4.2, benda ni boleh tak ada masalah tetapi pada saya baik awak tulis jadual 1 dan seterusnya. Tetapi terpulanglah kepada awak dan pensyarah. Tapi bila awak buat macam itu. Memang pensyarah akan setuju, penyelia awak akan setuju, tetapi  pemeriksa yang baca tesis awak adalah orang yang berbeza. Itu yang dikatakan sekolah yang berlainan. Bila school of thought itu berbeza, maka cara setiap pensyarah itu berlainan. Pelajar begini begitu begini dan sebagainya. Jadinya terpulang. Yang penting apabila kita buat, awak kena pastikan benda itu mudah untuk kita baca dan mudah untuk pemeriksa juga untuk baca. Jangan buat kerja susah kalau tak lambat lagilah kita bergraduat untuk akan datang. Seboleh-bolehnya jangan terlalu lama buat tesis. Kerana bila terlalu lama kita akan rasa sangsi. Betul ke yang saya buat selama ini. Ke saya pura-pura berangan atau pura-pura pandai. Saya rasa ini sahaja untuk bab 4 ye.

 

Original Text Video 9a. Results and discussion (Chapter 4) - Table Shape Analysis - 1 #JomTulis Tesis

Okay now we go to chapter 4. This chapter 4 is actually the chapter that is said to be your own writing study chapter. What you have studied over the years is the result. In this chapter 4 if seen in the book Let's Write a Thesis, we have an introduction, objective analysis 1, 2, 3, summary and conclusion. If we look now, for example, if we return to our earlier study of textual discourse study animation script Malay folklore, the introduction 4.1. As usual our introduction wants to introduce what is in this chapter. Don't get me wrong. Because there is a habit of students to place an introduction with a reference once. That is very unnecessary. This introduction we just want to introduce what is in the chapter. Do not put a reference because it has become like chapter 2 that there is a study highlight. Introduction to one paragraph only. Introduction 4.1. 4.2 we have begun to look back on our objectives.

The first objective of identifying the passage texture animation script Malay folklore. The title of this we take on objectives, so we continue to textual discourse animation script Malay folklore. This is his title. In this title you will put directly to the title instead of a verb for that title. Now that you have taken this title, you will use theory. We have already discussed that theory in chapter 3 earlier. If we want analysis we need to have a theory because we want to stick to something. If there is no theory it is like we are loose. If we do not have a description of the theory of analysis we become wrong. For example we will use theory, which is the theory of discourse analysis proposed by. Wait a second I try to show. For example we take the theory of discourse analysis by Normaliza Abd Rahim (2019). Normaliza Abd Rahim's Discourse Analysis Theory (2019) is divided into three elements, namely:

	Theory of Discourse Analysis Normaliza Abd Rahim (2019)
Content	Contect	Assumption
Themes	Grammar	Opinion
	Background	Reference
	Emotions	Questions

 

Next we go straight to 4.2.1 which is content. We have to write down what elements are close in the title. Enter five proofs. For example, you already have a system for coding. You took about 30 animated scripts. Enter the number for the animated script. An example is sk which refers to a script. So you will have one to thirty sk. So from all those examples you take only five. The rest you put in the appendix only. So now, for example you put sk 10, sk 13, sk 20, sk 23. This you can put as table 1: Family theme. Because you yourself have identified from the 30 scripts there will be for example 5 themes. From that theme and other themes you find that the five scripts seem to stand out. You take script 10 and put what theme. You have to make sure that in terms of what the family theme is. Because this folklore sometimes in terms of family is like a sparrow and the paradise has a connection. You put him has a character like the word paradise and his son. Sk 13 what character shows the family. Then under the table you make a little description. You explain the table one by one and explain about the family theme. How does that show the family theme. Because of that you need to take a sentence from the script. And mention as proof this verse shows kinship. For example, the word paradise has fed its children lovingly. The sentence in the script shows the family theme. Once you have identified the theme you need to give your opinion. Why do you think that shows family. For example, the chief said with his son at home. Examples of fish anglers. Make sure you include an example once. You can write something like this "This is possible". Because this is your opinion. So use the words “It is possible that the bird of paradise is a bird that is very loving to its young. This is because, the bird of paradise is always by his side ”. Explain until finished. And move on to the second table with the next theme. Similarly, you need to put huraiai. The description is not in one paragraph. Usually in two paragraphs. Separate so that there are not too many pages.

For content only you will have five tables for themes only. These are 5 tables not yet entered the second one which is ‘context’. So for 4.2.2 just got into context. As usual, we must first explain what the context is according to Normaliza Abd Rahim (2019). Describe what the context is. Then you divide it into grammar, background, and emotion. So according to this theory it is like that grammar. This grammar is very broad. So it is up to the students to choose 3 grammar only. Depends on the text. If you think this is a lot or that much depends. Here later you need to explain what the content means according to the theory you choose. There are three elements of context. If this grammar is very broad. So it is up to the students to choose three for each element. So now, if you feel that part of the element is a lot that is what you make as a study. For example, this background can be the background of time, place, and society. Emotions can be positive emotions and negative emotions.

Now this numbering system needs to be correct. So 4.2.2.1 will enter grammar. In grammar first describe what grammar is. According to anyone. At the end of the sentence you mention that this study focuses on three elements only. Then just break it down again. For example, under grammar there are three small points. If there is a subtopic you need to elaborate. And all is done just enter the data. All tables in the thesis should have horizontal lines only. Vertical lines need not exist. Schedule and you describe. Earlier the table has reached 5 now must be table 6. For grammar there are three, so you can have three for subtopics. So there will be three tables. Three tables for grammar, three for background tables i.e. time, place, community background. Table six above as the next sentence before the description of the table. The table must be written either at the bottom or at the top. That is why the numbering system for chapter 4 is very important. Have a table and description at the bottom.

So, it is necessary to use the first element and the second element of Discourse Analysis Theory. The third objective is to apply another theory which is Assumption Theory. So now, the content is ready, meaning the context is ready. Then prepare objective 1. After that you need to put the summary of objective 1. Summary of content and also context. The summary should be in one paragraph. Need to support the study from in chapter 2. Then we have to support with theory. For example, the word is supported by the Theory of Discourse Analysis by Normaliza Abd Rahim. For example this study is parallel or almost identical to the Theory of Discourse Analysis. These words you have to choose and must correspond to the Theory of Discourse Analysis. But keep in mind the support of the study, it is necessary to study from the total of the last five years only the latest. Make sure only five years. If now 2020, then the latest year is the last five years means it will end until 2016 only. Discourse studies are often done long ago. We need to take the latest so that our research is of better quality.

That's just a summary of objective 1. Not to mention objective 2. So the meaning near here is the effect. Do not write analysis. The sentence you got from above. Then you put the assumptions and explain a little what the assumptions mean according to who. Then we make that assumption and then we want to enter an opinion. This is a sub-topic for opinions. So explain first. According to Normaliza Abd Rahim, that opinion is. That opinion is what he is. Only then will there be this schedule. Each one you can give him has evidence from the child's conversation just now. Here too you need to use a language coding system. This is not a computer science system. Now we need to take a sample because now it has reached the part we need to interview. Like before, you have to decide for yourself how much coding you want. All of the data obtained should be placed near the back near the attachment. There are verses that do not show references, questions, and so on. So you have to choose which one is right. In the end also do not forget that we need to put a conclusion. Summarize the findings from objective two. And remember that conclusion should be supported by a study five years back only. Then support with theory. That thing must be there. From the results of the study we will support with theory. Finally, 4.4 is the conclusion. In conclusion I explain again. The final sentence should tell what is in the next chapter. So that there is continuity in chapter 4 and chapter 5. The last sentence of the next chapter blah ... blah ... blah ... This one is about the exhaustion from the summary description. There are lecturers who do not want to put a conclusion at the end after we analyze. Every description should be supported. For me young only. What we formulate we need to repeat and we support. It's the same if we put it in there. Sometimes I find a student that he does support every time he describes. Explain the opinion for example he will always support the theory. I see the sentence he is the same and what the same person supports is the same. The thing seemed like there was no effort on his part to make a different sentence. So make sure here the sentence must be different from the sentence above. This is important to summarize the results of the study we have obtained. For chapter 4 this is because we have two objectives. Remember ye chapter 4 we have and we are the ones analyzing. We are different from everyone else. This is our effort to interview people. We waited outside the fence. Although we actually have to take the truth. There are times when we are wrong. a letter of permission. We have to persevere as this researcher. For example from objective 1 this is 40 pages for page for objective 1 only. Master 80. Phd 120. Each of these pages should be balanced. You need to be balanced for each objective to provide findings. For example, say a total of 60 pages. So the number of pages per page for each objective must be balanced. So do not suddenly the third objective becomes less pages. Usually the third objective is important. If you want to run a little, you can. For example objective 1 41 pages, objective 2 43 pages. Objective 3 is more than 43 pages. If so, that's fine. If the imbalance is very good, there is no need for many objectives. If that's the case, I don't know what I want to say. You better make your own university if you don't want to listen to instructions. Remember this chapter 4 we have. In each thesis there must be a discourse marker. If there is none, it will not be academic writing. Discourse markers if you look at the book Let's Write a Thesis there are some discourse markers that I have listed. You can refer. Students really like discourse markers therefore. Therefore, students like to use it every time they write. I don't really understand. There are hundreds of discourse markers in this. Use it wisely. When we read the thesis, it is cool to read this thesis. So use discourse markers. But there is a problem. There is this student I read this thesis. Indeed, he uses the discourse marker which is very good. I don't know if he might take it from my book. But when we look, it must not be. Why. Because it does not fit with the sentence. Indeed, the word has never been heard by the community. For example, discourse markers however such a fact that can not be ignored is blah ... blah ... blah. That for the first verse is okay. Suddenly the next sentence is incorrect. What a thing he made. It has nothing to do with the selection of the discourse marker. It is therefore appropriate for students to use the correct discourse markers. And diversify. Do not keep using discourse markers therefore until the end of the thesis chapter. A reminder to this student. So I think this chapter 4 is okay so if I have explained this clearly. The use of these tables remember ye. If possible do not make a mistake near the schedule. Do not write table 4.1 table 4.2, this thing can be no problem but I think you should write table 1 and so on. But it is up to you and the lecturer. But when you do that. Indeed the lecturer will agree, your supervisor will agree, but the examiner who read your thesis is a different person. That's what different schools say. If the school of thought is different, then the way each lecturer is different. Students like this so and so. So it depends. The important thing is when we do, you have to make sure it is easy for us to read and easy for the examiner to read as well. Do not do hard work if it is not too late we will graduate for the future. If possible, do not take too long to write a thesis. Because if it takes too long we will feel suspicious. That's exactly what I did all this time. To me pretending to be chestnuts or pretending to be clever. I think this is only for chapter 4.

Pautan video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WkDMTy6FJqA

Bukti subscribe:

Rujukan:

Normaliza Abd Rahim (2019). Jom Tulis Tesis!. Selangor: Penerbit Universiti Putra Malaysia

Kehadiran minggu 11:

BBN3402SATU2020: MINGGU11 TERJEMAHAN VIDEO(7)

 

7. Sorotan Kajian (Bab 2) #JomTulisTesis

 

Bab 2 sorotan kajian. Dalam sorotan kajian 2.1 pengenalan seperti biasa. Dalam pengenalan kita nak huraikan apa ada dalam bab ini. Juga kita jelaskan juga dalam bab ini juga terdiri daripada dua subtopik yang berkaitan. Pastikan subtopik itu berkaitan dengan tajuk kita. Jadi dicadangkan kalau biasanya untuk master, bachelor, dan juga terdiri daripada dua subtopik sebab itu terpulang. Kita tengok berapakah pembolehubah dalam kesetiap tajuk itu. Kemudian yang PHD pula kita, kita kadang-kadang ada tiga subtopik atau dua. Kita tengok juga apa pembolehubah dalam subtopik ini. Contohnya 2.2 ini kajian tentang okey kita ambil yang besar dulu. Jadi mungkin kita ambil kajian tentang wacana sahaja, Okey jadi kajian tentang wacana ini kita letaklah. Kita letaklah dalam kajian-kajian yang pastikan bahawa kajian itu satu mesti lima tahun kebelakang. Okey saya sudah jelaskan banyak kali bahawa lima tahun kebelakang maknanya tahun yang awak hantar tesis. Tolak belakang lima tahun. Bukannya tahun awak daftar. Kalau kita daftar 2020 kemudian awak nak tolak pulak ambil lima tahun kebelakang ini dah salah. Kerana awak baru daftar 2020, maknanya langkah awak nak hantar tesis 2023 mungkin. Jadi kalau hantar tesis 2023, maknanya sorotan kajian tentulah lima tahun kebelakang yang berakhir 2019. Jadi apa ada dalam ini mestilah yang lima tahun terkini, Jadi sebagai pelajar, awak tidak boleh katakana tiada kajian yang saya jumpa. Saya tak jumpa lah kajian ini prof. Saya tidak jumpa yang mana terkini. Saya jumpa yang 1928-an, 1960-an, awal 2000 itu tidak boleh. Semua kajian ada. Walaupun maknanya kalau apapun paling hampir adalah sikit-sikit hampir pun boleh. Itu yang jadi kita dapat jurang penyelidikan. Jadi yang ini awak boleh letakkan ataupun pastikan ambil satu kajian yang begitu menyerlah tentang wacana. Contohnya, bermakna awak huraikan semua tentang kajian tersebut kemudian sokong. Jadi sekarang dalam sorotan kajian ini perlulah cari persamaan dan perbezaan. Itulah jadinya kritis dalam sorotan kajian. Ini perlu cari persamaan, perbezaan. Barulah jadi kritis. Tidak bolehlah ada pelajar tulis sampai dua hingga tiga halaman. Contohnya, kajian oleh Normaliza Abd Rahim (2019), dia letak dua hingga tiga halaman. Dua tiga halaman nama Normaliza nama satu muka halaman. Satu yang lain itu dia tulis sahaja sampai tiga halaman. Sampai tidak ada rujukan langsung. Jadi itu salah caranya, kerana didapati tidak kritis. Kemudian awak boleh jurus kepada kajian tentang animasi. Secara menyeluruhnya animasi dari segi mana. Ni contoh animasi dari segi skrip sahaja ke animasi cerita biasa ke animasi cerita rakyat ke semua masuk disini. Ambil yang lima tahun terkini dan kita kalau buat sorotan kajian bukanlah Malaysia sahaja. Barat pun perlu diambil. Jepun, Korea, China semua kita perlu ambil supaya kita punya sorotan meluas terutamanya animasi. Memang ada banyak kajian dari Jepun terutama dari Korea, Jepun yang paling terkenal dengan animasi. Jadi huraikan dan pastikan kritis. Kemudia barulah masuk jurang penyelidikan. Okey dalam jurang penyelidikan ini pastikan bahawa dalam jurang penyelidikan ini kena jelaskan apa jurang yang ada dalam ini. Okey fokus pada ini berkait dengan kajian awak sendiri. Jadi awak senaraikan nama nama ini. Kajian ini berfokus kepada contohnya bla bla bla. Jadi kajian itu awak senaraikan kajian yang ada dalam ini. Okey ada juranglah dalam kajian tersebut kemudia itu bermakna kita nak jelaskan jurang itu senarai-senarai nama letakkan kat sini. Kaitkan balik dengan kajian kita. Kemudian serupa juga dengan kajian number dua. Senaraikan itu apa jurang dia. Apa persamaan sebab itu ada persamaan dan perbezaan. Kaitkan juga dengan kajian awak sendiri. Itu yang dari jurang penyelidikan. 2.5 kesimpulan okey jadi kita kenal pastikan rujukan lima tahun kebelakang number dua. Penulisan dalam sorotan kajian perlulah mecari persamaan dan perbezaan. Jadi kita perlulah kritis. Kajian yang hampir sama, kita banyak berbeza pun boleh tidak bersetuju. Bermaknanya ada perbezaan. Jadi cari perkataan-perkataan yang bersesuaian. Perkataan yang menyokong, tidak sokong tidak bersetuju. Ada banyak. Banyak jadi maknanya penyusunan ayat itu menunjukkan sama ada persamaan atau perbezaan. Serupa juga disini memerlukan penanda wacana. Penanda wacana ini sangat penting kerana kalau tidak nanti dia jadi tulisan awak sendiri. Macam awak buat karangan biasa tanpa penanda wacana. Ini harus kita lihat perkara-perkara penting lima tahun kebelakang persamaan perbezaan iaitu penulisan secara kritis mempunyai penanda wacana dan juga jurang penyelidikan pelu ada sebagai satu subtopik iaitu membuat kaitan kajian dalam sorotan ini dengan kajian awak sendiri. Jadi seperti biasa kesimpulan itu kita sampaikan seperti bab 2 yang lain. Ayat akhir dalam kesimpulan haruslah letak bab seterusnya iaitu bab 3 bla bla bla. Okey untuk halaman. Berapa halaman ya prof. Jadi biasanya kalau pelajar bachelor atau diploma dengan master biasanya kita letak yang sama iaitu yang ini 2.2 2.3 kita boleh letak 15, 15 halaman. Bermakna 15 halaman untuk ini, 15 halaman untuk ini. Untuk PHD sebab kita banyak kajian secara mendalam juga jadi 2.2 2.3 kita naik. Okey ini 30, ini 30 jadi 60 kalau kurang sikit pun lebih kurang macam 25, 25 berbeza jumlah halaman kerana kalau kurang sorotan nampak sangat pelajar itu tidak membaca. Tujuan kita ada sorotan ialah supaya kita dapat melihat perbezaan antara kajian yang ada dan mencari jurang penyelidikan kajian tersebut dan kaitan dengan kajian yang kita lakukan. Sebab itulah kita perlu banyak untuk kita. Kita sorot dalam bab 2 ini. Jika kurang maknanya apa benda yang kit acari perbezaan. Apa yang kita nak cari jurang penyelidikan, tidak ada. Jadi perlu sangat penting mempunyai jumlah halaman yang bersesuaian. Ada juga saya dapati bahawa bila saya menjadi pemeriksa pelajar PHD, pelajar master dia punya sorotan kajian adalah 14 halaman sahaja. Itu untuk dua ini bukan dua ini. Silap dia keseluruhan bab 2 ada 14 sahaja. Kemudian ada pelajar PHD dia punya 25 serupa juga pelajar PHD tu menulis 25 halaman untuk kesemua ini. Jadi tidak orang kata tidak bersesuaian dengan kajian PHD dia. Sorotan kajian ini juga penting serupa penting untuk bab 1, bab 3, bab 4, dan bab 5. Kira semua bab penting. Jadi janganlah yang ini jadi halaman terlalu sedikit sehingga kita tidak dapat nak mencari apakah jurang penyelidikan dia. Bagaimana awak menulis sorotan kajian ada persamaan tidak, ada perbelaan tak. Adakah awak buat penulisan secara kritis. Adakah awak menggunakan penanda wacana yang bersesuaian. Adakah awak sorot kajian daripada kajian lima tahun kebelakang. Ini semua penting dalam sorotan kajian.

 

 

Study Highlights (Chapter 2) #JomTulisTesis

 

Chapter 2 highlights of the study. In the study highlights 2.1 introduction as usual. In the introduction we want to describe what is in this chapter. Also, we explain also in this chapter also consists of two related subtopics. Make sure the subtopic is relevant to our topic. So, it is recommended that usually for master, bachelor, and also consists of two subtopics the reason is up to you. We see how many variables are in each of those titles. Then the PHD is ours, we sometimes have three subtopics or two. We also look at what variables are in this subtopic. For examples 2.2 this is a study on okay we take the big first. So maybe we take the study of discourse only, Okay, so we put the study of this discourse. We put in studies that make sure that the study one must five years ago. Okay, I have explained many times that the last five years mean the year you submitted your thesis. Push back five years. Not the year you registered. If we register for 2020 then you want to reject it and take it five years ago is wrong. Because you have just registered for 2020, it means your move to submit a 2023 thesis is possible. So, if you submit a thesis 2023, it means that the highlight of the study must be the last five years ending 2019. So, what is in this must be the last five years, So, as a student, you cannot say no study I found. I did not find this study prof. I did not find the latest one. I found that the 1928s, 1960s, early 2000s were not allowed. All studies are available. Although it means that whatever is closest is a little almost possible. That is why we get the research gap. So, this one you can put or make sure to take a study that is so obvious about the discourse. For example, it means you describe everything about the study and then support it. So now in the highlights of this study it is necessary to look for similarities and differences. That is critical in the study. This needs to find similarities, differences. Then it becomes critical. No student should write up to two to three pages. For example, a study by Normaliza Abd Rahim (2019), he placed two to three pages. Two to three page name Normaliza one page page name. The other one he only wrote up to three pages. Until there is no direct reference. So that's the wrong way, because it was found to be not critical. Then you can move on to the study of animation. Overall animation in terms of which. This is an example of animation in terms of script only to normal story animation to folk story animation to all come in here. Take the latest five years and we if the highlight of the study is not only Malaysia. The West also needs to be taken. Japan, Korea, China all we need to take so that we have a wide spotlight especially animation. There are indeed many studies from Japan especially from Korea, Japan which is most famous for animation. So, describe and make sure it is critical. Then came the research gap. Okay in this research gap make sure that in this research gap you have to explain what the gap is in this. Okay focus on this related to your own study. So, you list these names. This study focuses on for example blah blah blah. So that study you list the studies that are in this. Okay there is a gap in the study then that means we want to explain the gap the lists of names put here. Relate it to our study. Then similar to study number two. List that what a gap he is. What similarities caused there are similarities and differences. Also relate to your own study. That's from the research gap. 2.5 conclusion okay so we know make sure reference five years past number two. Writing in the study highlights should look for similarities and differences. So, we need to be critical. The study is almost the same, we differ a lot but can disagree. That means there is a difference. So, find the right words. Words that support, do not support do not agree. There are many. So many meanings that the sentence structure shows either similarities or differences. Similarly, here also requires discourse markers. This discourse marker is very important because otherwise he will be your own writing. Like you make a regular essay without a discourse marker. This we should look at the important things five years ago the difference of difference that is critical writing has discourse markers and also research gap there is as a subtopic that is to make the study in this spotlight with your own research. So as usual we convey that conclusion like the other chapter 2. The final sentence in the conclusion should be the next chapter which is chapter 3 blah blah blah. Okay for the page. How many pages does prof. So usually if a bachelor or diploma student with a master usually we put the same that is this 2.2 2.3 we can put 15, 15 pages. Meaning 15 pages for this, 15 pages for this. For PHD because we do a lot of in-depth research as well so 2.2 2.3 we go up. Okay, this is 30, this is 30 so 60 if it is a little less, it is about 25, 25 different number of pages because if there is less highlight, it looks like the student is not reading. The purpose of our highlight is so that we can see the differences between the existing studies and find the research gap of the study and its relevance to the study we are doing. That is why we need so much for us. We highlight in this chapter 2. If less means what things kit kicks the difference. What we are looking for is a research gap, there is none. So, it should be very important to have the appropriate number of pages. I also found that when I became a PHD student examiner, the master student he had a study highlight was only 14 pages. That's for these two not these two. Wrong he whole chapter 2 there are only 14. Then there are PHD students he has 25 similar also PHD students write 25 pages for all this. No one said it did not fit his PHD study. The highlights of this study are also equally important for chapter 1, chapter 3, chapter 4, and chapter 5. Calculate all important chapters. Don't let this be a page too little so that we cannot find out what the research gap is. How do you write the study highlights there are no similarities, there are no differences. Do you write critically. Do you use appropriate discourse markers. Did you highlight the study from the study five years ago. These are all important in the study highlights.

Pautan video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQSL1RPfhtk

Bukti subscribe:

Rujukan:

Normaliza Abd Rahim (2019). Jom Tulis Tesis!. Selangor: Penerbit Universiti Putra Malaysia

Kehadiran minggu 11:

BBN3402SATU2020: MINGGU11 TERJEMAHAN VIDEO(6)

 

6. Definisi Operasional & Organisasi Kajian (Bab 1) #JomTulisTesis

 

Bab 1 seterunya kita pergi 1.8 iaitu definisi operasional. Okey agak sukar ya kadang-kadang pelajar ni dia agak keliru, operasional bermakna tentang definisi yang tentang kajian kita jalankan bukan definisi konsep. Bukanlah definisi macam contoh ada pelajar pergi buat apa makna tekstual. Satu animasi, satu cerita, satu rakyat, satu Melayu, itu salah ya. Kita bukan nak definisi itu. Kalau definisi tiap-tiap satu inilah pelajar akan rujuk kamus dewan je. Dia rujuk semua jenis kamus. Tak mahu. Jangan. Jadi operasional iaitu tentang kajian kita. Jadi biasanya definisi operasional ini minima dua ataupun maksima paling maksima pun tiga. Tentang bagaimana kita nak jalankan kajian ni supaya bila pembaca, baca baru faham. Owh ini maksudnya. Jadi kalau kita tunjuk tajuk ini kitab oleh ambil satu wacana tekstual. Okey lagi satu skrip, animasi, cerita rakyat Melayu. Boleh kalau kita nak ambil bezakan skrip animasi. Jadi satu skrip animasi yang takde kaitan pulak skrip animasi apa. Jadi kitab boleh teruskan untuk tajuk ini mungkin ada dua. Tajuk yang lain mungkin ada tiga. Kalau kita ambil tajuk daripada kejuruteraan. Contohnya, mungkin operasional ada banyak. Sebab kita dia ada banyak dia punya pembolehubah dekat dalam tu. Kalau daripada apa nama yang kalau buat tesis science pun begitu. Ada banyak pembolehubah yang membolehkan kita membuat definisi operasional. Supaya pemeriksa faham apa kaitan tu dalam dengan dalam tesis tersebut. Kalau dari segi, kalau kita tengok tesis dan bentuk ekonomi pun begitu. Kita ada banyak dia punya pembolehubah. Jadi akan mungkin lebih daripada tiga. Jadi untuk yang ini kita fokus kepada dua. Ni saya bagi contoh ya. Jadi awak boleh berat dalam macam ni. Kemudia letak contohnya wacana dan tekstual. Tapi wacana tekstual ni awak nak kaji nak buat definisi operasional ni mesti berkaitan dengan kajian. Ya mesti berkaitan dengan kajian dan pastikan bahawa bukanlah yang bermakna yang kena ambil rujukan daripada perlu ada rujukan. Ini perlu ada rujukan. Ada satu cara, satu maknanya awak buat wacana tekstual. Orang kata apa berkaitan dengan kajian awak. Wacana tekstual yang berfokus kepada skrip animasi. Wacana ini yang berfokus kepada skrip animasi. Wacana ini wacana tekstual ini akan di analisis dengan menggunakan tiga elemen. Ni contoh lah ya. Contoh tiga elemen iaitu kandungan konteks dan andaian. Jadi wacana tekstual menurut buku Normaliza Abd Rahim (2019), wacana tekstual boleh jadi rujukan. Dia juga 1.8.2 iaitu skrip animasi cerita rakyat ni. Jadi ini kenalah berkaitan dengan kajian awak. Apa dia huraikan serba ringkas. Skrip animasi, cerita rakyat ini terdiri daripada 20 cerita sebab dalam awak punya tesis, awak punya analisis 20 cerita. Jadi ni cerita tersebut skrip berbentuk apa dia. Jadi huraian mungkin yang ini skrip animasi, cerita rakyat ni awak huraikan ialah kita nak berkaitan tentang kajian kita. Jadi takde rujukan awak nak letak takpe boleh diterima sebab definisi yang ini memang berkaitan dengan kajian awak. Jadi ada dua cara. Satu cara mempunyai rujukan. Ini ada rujukan jadi yang kedua tiada rujukan maknanya awak buat huraian. Huraian tentang wacana tekstual tu dari segi konteks awak punya tesis. Jadi takde rujukan. Dia boleh diterima tetapi macam saya katakan sebelum ini. Rujuk penyelia. Kalau rujuk pengenalan, penyelia ada macam saya katakana sebelum ini. Ini kita berbeza pendapat. Berbeza sekolah jadi difference school of tough. Jadi pemikiran kita berbeza. Jadi pemikiran penyelia kalau ada satu juta penyelia kita ada satu juta pemikiran yang berbeza. Jadi terpulang kepada penyelia. Jadi kalau saya tiba-tiba hari ini saya kata okey memang tak perlu sebab bagi saya definisi operasional ni tentang kajian bagaimana awak nak jalankan kajian. Nama pun operasional. Jalankan kajian bahan kita nak definisi konsep bukannya kita apa jadi kalau ada rujukan pastikan kalau nak buat rujukan tak boleh ya. Ini tak boleh rujuk kamus. Dah kenapa nak rujuk kamus. Tak payah. Kena rujuk daripada kajian-kajian. Banyaknya rujuk kamus yang kata menurut Kamus Dewan Edisi Keempat, wacana tekstual iyalah bla bla bla. Tak boleh. Tak boleh itu pun kita pun tahu. Jangalah rujuk kamus. Dah kenapa kan. Jadi kita rujuk rujukan. Rujukan kajian-kajian daripada orang lain ya. Saya kata satu boleh rujuk kedua tiada rujukan boleh dan terpulang kepada penyelia masing-masing. Jadi kalau diterima itu iyalah akurlah. Ikut cakap dia. Jadi sekarang ini kalau kita lihat setelah ambil definisi operasional. Kita ada teruskan iaitu kat belakang ini ada ya subtopik 1.9 iaitu organisasi  kajian. Okey organisasi kajian ini sebenarnya terpulang kepada individu. Kepada pelajar  dan juga penyelia. Yang ini biasanya saya akan suruh untuk pelajar PHD. Pelajar PHD saya akan suruh letakkanlah organisasi kajian. Kadang-kadang pelajar Master pun boleh kalau tak letak pun takpe. Ini boleh pilih. Jika perlu organisasi kajian ini awak buat dalam bentuk perenggan. Jadi perenggan pertama apa ada dalam bab 1. Kemudian perenggan seterusnya perenggan 1 apa ada dalam bab 1. Perenggan 2 apa dalam bab 2 perenggan 3 ni kita nak organisasi. Kita nak buat secara ringkas supaya bila penyelia baca dia rasa owh bab 1 ada bend ani rupanya. Bab 2 ada bend ani rupanya. Bab 3 ada ni, jadi organisasi penyusunan. Penyusunan tesis kita secara teratur. Jadi perenggan dalam ringkas sahaja. Ringkas sahaja kerana macam saya nyatakan kat sebelum ini setiap baba da pengenalan. Pengenalan tu kita dah katakana dah apa ada dalam bab tesebut. Tetapi dalam organisasi kajian ini kita kena nyatakanlah secara ringkas apa ada dalam tiap-tiap perenggan. Jadi untuk pelajar PHD memang saya wajibkan supaya dia sendiri boleh faham apa ada dalam tiap-tiap bab. Kalau pelajar Master bolehlah kalau dia nak barat. Tak barat pun takpe. Pelajar bachelor pun takpe. Diploma pun takde masalah kalau ada yang nak buat. Pokoknya terpulang kepada penyelia. Dan akhir sekali 1.10 baru masuk kesimpulan. Semua dah saya macam saya katakana tadi semua dah mesti ada kesimpulan. Takde kesimpulan manalah boleh. Kita nak simpulkan apa ada dalam bab tersebut. Jadi ada yang saya dapati tesis takde kesimpulan tentang macam ni. Bila tergantung habis je terlupa yang ini. Jadikan, kita tengok dah masuk bab 2. Jadi takde kaitan langsung dengan bab 2. Tak boleh. Kita kena ada kesimpulan, kesimpulan ini kita simpulkan apa ada dalam bab 1 dan juga ingat ayat akhir. Ayat akhir kita kena letak kaitakan dengan bab seterusnya. Bab seterusnya iaitu bab 2 akan membincangkan sorotan kajian bla bla bla. Jadi bolehlah kita dapati bahawa ada kesinambungan antara bab 1 dan bab 2. Jadi serupa juga macam saya terangkan dalam bab 2 lain. Dalam bab kesimpulan mestilah ayat akhir mesti ad akita nyatakan apa ada dalam bab seterusnya. Jadi penting ada kesimpulan. Tapi tulah macam saya katakana tadi, different crost  tough. Jadi bila berbeza takpelah kita redha dan kita terima. Okey dah bab 1. Ini kita dah bersemangat dah bab 1 kita ni maknanya kita dah habis bab 1. Lupa nak cakap berapa halaman bab 1 ya prof? Okey bab 1 ini kita biasanya halaman ya, halaman bab 1 ni kita sebab kita dah masuk dia punya orang kata apa latar belakanglah, persoalan, kita punya masalah kajian semua tu lebih kurang lapan hingga 10 sahaja. Inikan yang saya katakan ada pelajar letak sampai 30 halaman dia akan jadi macam seolah-olah buat sorotan kajian. Itu dah salah sebab masalah kajian kita ambil betul-betul penting masukkan dekat dalam tu. Sedangkan kita tahu bahawa dalam bab 2 memang banyak ada jurang dekat situ. Jadi itu pun semua adalah masalah tetapi kita ambil yang penting sahaja. Jadi bila dia letak masalah kajian itu ada 30 bermakna dah memang jadi sebanyak 15 halaman dijadikan 30. Dah salah dah. Sebabnya yang penting sekarang ini dia akan jadi samalah dengan bab 2. Dia jadi masalah kajian itu perenggan lebih. Bersemangat sangat dia tulis permasalahan kajian dia jadi 15 halaman. Ya itu memanglah sikit dah jadi macam sorotan kajian. Dah jadi salah. Jadi saya katakana tadi permasalahan kajian itu kita fokuskan ikut objektif. Objektif ada dua. Dua perenggan masalah kajian, objektif ada tiga, tiga perenggan ia dapat padat dekat dalam tu. Walaupun ringkas tetapi padat. Jadi dikaitkan dengan objektif tapi yang selebihnya sorotan ataupun jurang penyelidikan yang lain mempunyai masalah ada dalam bab 2. Jadi pelajar boleh rujuk disitu. Jadi ni kita buang kita letak lebih kurang macam ni. Paling lebih 12 muka surat. Tapi jangan kurang daripada lapan. Dah jadi macam kurang halaman. Jadi lebih sikit boleh. Kalau nak sampai 15 pun boleh. Boleh diterima. Sebab mungkin dia bersemangat nak tulis latar belakang., Tak ada masalah. Tetapi janganlah lebih. Lebih sampai 15. 15 tu orang kata dah tak bolehlah kita takut dia jadi seperti macam saya katakana tadi seperti sebulat bab 2. Jangan. Jadi bila bab 2 tu mulalah pemeriksa akab clash ini tak boleh. Ini tak boleh. Clash dia potong-potong. Saya kalau misalnya panjang sangat saya lipat halaman terus saya Tulis kat sini sepatutnya masuk bab 2. Sebab masa viva senang saya ingat yang saya lipat tu adalah setebal-tebalnya yang ada kertas pun ada masalah kajian. Sebab dia berleter je lebih dekat dalam tu entah pape menurut pendapat sayalah. Bukan saya maksudkannya pendapat dia. Dia kata ianya seperti bahawa pelajar ini memang tidak suka belajar. Masa tu baca kertas awak tu siapa yang awak kata awak dapati dia boleh tengok sekali. Itu dia kata pelajar tak suka mengira contohnya. Dia dapati sekali itu pun dia tengok anak buah dia masa raya. Masa raya yang dia jumpa dua minit. Lepastu dia kata anak buah dia pergi main dekat belakang. Itu dia dapati budak tak nak mengira 1 sampai 20. Dia tidak tahu bahawa hari raya siapa pulak nak mengira 1 sampai 20. Kena pulak buat ujian, ujian depan bapak saudara. Nak kena baca sifir pulak kat depan tu. Kalau di abaca sifir dapat duit raya banyak tidak apa la juga. Okey jadi kita ingat ya dalam bab 1.

 

Definition of Operational & Study Organization (Chapter 1) #JomTulisTesis

 

Chapter 1 next we go 1.8 which is the operational definition. Okay, it's a bit difficult, sometimes student is a bit confused, operational means about the definition of the study we are conducting is not a definition of a concept. It is not a definition of an example where students go for what textual meaning. The animation, the story, the people, the Malays, it is yes. We do not want that definition. If the definition of each of these is the student will refer to the board dictionary. He referred to all types of dictionaries. I don’t want like that. Don't. So operational that is about our study. So, usually this operational definition is a minimum of two or a maximum of at least three. About how we want to conduct this study so that when the reader understands. This is what it means. So, if we show the title of this book by taking a textual discourse. Okay again the script, animation, Malay folklore. Yes, if we want to differentiate between animated scripts. So, an animated script that has nothing to do with any animated script. So, the book can go on for this title there may be two. Other titles may have three. If we take a title from engineering. For example, there may be many operations. Because we have a lot, he has variables close in there. If from what name if you do a science thesis. There are many variables that allow us to make operational definitions. So that the examiner understands what the connection has to do with the thesis. In terms of, if we look at the thesis and the economic form as well. We have a lot he has variables. So, there will probably be more than three. For this one we focus on two. Let me give you an example. You can writes like this. Then place for example discourse and textual. But this textual discourse you want to study to make this operational definition must be related to the study. Yes, it must be related to the study and make sure that it does not mean that there should be a reference than there should be a reference. This needs to be a reference. There is one way, one means you make a textual discourse. People say what is relevant to your study. Textual discourse focused on animated scripts. This discourse focuses on animated scripts. This discourse this textual discourse will be analyzed using three elements. Here is an example. Examples of three elements are contextual content and assumptions. So textual discourse according to the book Normaliza Abd Rahim (2019), textual discourse can be a reference. He is also 1.8.2 which is the animated script of this folklore. So, this has to do with your research. What he described briefly. Animated script, this folk tale consists of 20 stories because in you have a thesis, you have an analysis of 20 stories. This is the story of what the script is like. So, the possible explanation that this is an animated script, this folk tale you describe is that we want to be relevant about our study. So, no reference you want to place cannot be accepted because this definition is indeed related to your study. So, there are two ways. One way is to having a reference. This has a reference so the second one has no reference meaning you make a description. The description of the textual discourse in terms of the context you have a thesis. So, no reference. He is acceptable but as I said before. Consult a supervisor. If you refer to the introduction, the supervisor is like I said before. This we disagree. Different schools become different schools of tough. So, our thinking is different. So, the thoughts of the supervisor if there are one million of our supervisor we have a million different thoughts. So, it is up to the supervisor. So, if I suddenly today say okey there is no need for me to give this operational definition of the study of how you want to conduct the study. The name is operational. Do a study of the material we want to define the concept instead of us what so if there is a reference make sure if you want to make a reference cannot. This does not refer to the dictionary. Why do you want to refer to the dictionary. No need. Must refer to studies. Many refer to dictionaries that say according to the Fourth Edition Board Dictionary, textual discourse is blah blah blah. Cannot. We can't even know that. Do not refer to the dictionary. Why? So, we refer to the reference. Reference studies from others yes. I said one can refer the second no referral can and it is up to the respective supervisor. So, if it is accepted, then agree. Follow him. So now if we look after taking the operational definition. We have to continue that behind this there is yes subtopic 1.9 which is the study organization. Okay the organization of this study is actually up to the individual. To students as well as supervisors. This one I usually recommend for PHD students. My PHD student will tell you to set up a study organization. Sometimes Master students can even if they don't put it. This is optional. If necessary the organization of this study you do in the form of paragraphs. So, what is the first paragraph in chapter 1. Then the next paragraph is paragraph 1 what is in chapter 1. Paragraph 2 what in chapter 2 paragraph 3 we want to organize. We want to make it brief so that when the supervisor reads its he feels chapter 1 there is a bend any apparently. Chapter 2 there is a bend apparently. Chapter 3 is here, so organization organization. Regular preparation of our thesis. So, paragraph in brief only. It's simple because like I said before, every baba is an introduction. That introduction we have already said what is in that chapter. But in the organization of this study we have to state briefly what is in each paragraph. So, for PHD students, I am obligated so that he himself can understand what is in each chapter. If he is a Master student, he can if he wants to go west. Not even west. Bachelor students are not allowed. Diplomas are not a problem if anyone wants to do it. The point is up to the supervisor. And finally, 1.10 just came to the conclusion. Everything I did like I said earlier, everything must have a conclusion. There is no conclusion where it can be. We want to conclude what is in the chapter. So, I found that the thesis did not draw conclusions about this kind. When it hangs, I forget this one. So, we see that it has entered chapter 2. So, it has nothing to do with chapter 2. It cannot. We have to have a conclusion, this conclusion we summarize what is in chapter 1 and also remember the last sentence. Our final sentence has to do with the next chapter. The next chapter which is chapter 2 will discuss the highlights of the study blah blah blah. So, we can find that there is a continuation between chapter 1 and chapter 2. So, it is similar as I explained in others chapter 2. In the conclusion chapter must be the final sentence must ad akita state what is in the next chapter. So, it is important to have a conclusion. But the plague like I said earlier, different crost tough. So, when it is different, we must not be satisfied and we accept. Okay, chapter 1. Now we are excited about chapter 1, this means we have finished chapter 1. I forgot to say how many pages of chapter 1, prof? Okay this chapter 1 we usually pages, this page chapter 1 we because we have entered he has people say what the background is, questions, we have a study problem all about eight to 10 only. Here I say there are students who put up to 30 pages he will be as if to make a study highlight. That is wrong because the problem of our study is really important to put close in there. While we know that in chapter 2 there are many gaps near there. So even that is all a problem but we take only the important ones. So, when he puts the problem of the study there are 30 means that it has become 15 pages into 30. It is wrong. The important reason now is that he will be the same as chapter 2. He is the problem of the study paragraph more. Very enthusiastic he wrote the problems of his study so 15 pages. Yes, of course it has become a bit of a study highlight. It went wrong. So, I said earlier that the problem of the study we focused on following the objectives. There are two objectives. Two paragraphs of the study problem, the objective is three, three paragraphs it can be dense close in there. Although simple but compact. So, it is related to the objective but the rest of the highlights or other research gaps have problems in chapter 2. So, students can refer there. So here we throw our place more or less like this. At most 12 pages. But not less than eight. It has become like less pages. So, a little more can. If you want to reach 15, you can. Acceptable. Because maybe he is eager to write the background., No problem. But do not overdo it. More until 15. 15 people say we cannot be afraid of him so like I said earlier as a whole chapter 2. Do not. So, when chapter 2 starts, the examiner will not be able to clash. This is not possible. Clash him in pieces. For example, if I am very long, I will fold the page and I will write it here. It should go into chapter 2. Because the viva time I was happy to remember that I folded it is as thick as paper and there is a study problem. I do not mean his opinion. He said it was like that this student did not like to study. At that time, read your paper, who did you say you found he could see once. That he said students do not like to count for example. He found that once he looked at his men during the feast. The time he spent was two minutes. Then he said his men went to play near the back. That he found the boy did not want to count 1 to 20. He did not know that on Eid who would want to count 1 to 20. He had to go for a test, the next test of your uncle. I want to read the cipher at the front. If you can read a lot of Raya money, it doesn't matter. Okay so we remember yes in chapter 1.

Pautan video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6bANk-CrrhI

Bukti subscribe:

Rujukan:

Normaliza Abd Rahim (2019). Jom Tulis Tesis!. Selangor: Penerbit Universiti Putra Malaysia

Kehadiran minggu 11:

BBN3402SATU2020: MINGGU11 TERJEMAHAN VIDEO(5)

 

5. Kepentingan Kajian (Bab 1) #JomTulisTesis

Bab 1, 1.6 Kepentingan Kajian, okay kepentingan kajian ini memang kita kena aaaa ceritakan atau jelaskan dengan lebih terperinci kerana di sini biasanya  kita dalam borang pemeriksa, kita ada satu bahagian yang menunjukkan apakah kepentingan kajian ini. Kalau kajian tak penting kenapa pula kita nak jalankan kajian.  Jadi sebab itulah ada kepentingan yang kita jalankan kajian. Jadi untuk bahagian ini kita akan tulis dengan menggunakan subtopik. Jadi subtopik kepentingan kajian ini dibawahnya kita ada lagi subtopik yang lain. Jadi yang bahagian ini aaaa kita kena ambil ye kalau contohnya sekarang kajian kita tentang wacana tekstual skrip animasi cerita rakyat, jadi kajian ini penting kerana apa, untuk siapa, jadi kita kena nyatakan. Tapi dalam kepentingan kajian ini kita kena jelaskan mengikut yang besar dahulu jadi kalau daripada kajian ini kita lihat mungkinlah kepentingan kepada masyarakat. Jadi apa dia, kena huraikan bawah ini aaa jadi masyarakat itu besar jadi bila besar itu kita huraikan dalam satu perenggan. Kemudian kita kecilkan lagi 1.6.2 apa yang kecik lagi, contohnya Kementerian Pelajaran atau Kementerian Pendidikan contohnya. Jadi letak tajuk ini maknanya kajian ini penting untuk yang ini. Jadi huraikan bawah dia tapi pastikan bila kita nak huraikan itu kita kaitkan balik dengan kajian kita, makna tajuk kita itu kajian kita dari segi mana dari sudut mana yang penting itu. Kemudian turun lagi yang kecil lagi mungkin sekolah dari sudut mana, dari segi mana yang pentingnya kajian ini. Jadi adakah ia penting kepada errr kepada cikgu sahaja guru besar ataupun pelajar jadi itu yang lain pulak jadi yang ini kita boleh letak pelajar jadi daripada besar hinggalah ke kecil. Jadi sekarang ini pelajar dari segi mana yang pentingnya huraikan pula satu perenggan kemudian yang yang sini mungkinlah dari guru sebab guru perlu menyediakan bahan untuk Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran (PNP).  Jadi kita huraikan daripada segi apa jadi dalam ini kadang kala ada dapati aaaa ada penyelia yang menyatakan bahawa setiap huraian dekat dalam ini yang awak sudah jelaskan untuk subtopik ini perlu disokong dengan kajian sarjana lain ataupun kajian-kajian lain. Boleh juga sebenarnya macam saya katakan terpulang kepada penyelia kerana saya ulang sekali lagi iaitu kita ini penyelia semua mempunyai Different skill of thought okay pemikiran kita berbeza jadi mungkin ada penyelia kataa “okay awak letak sokong, awak letak sokongan untuk setiap satu kenapa pentingnya kepada masyarakat, kenapa pentingnya kepada kementerian, kenapa sekolah, kenapa pelajar, kenapa guru”. Jadi kena ada sokong, jadi macam saya kalau dia huraikan dekat sini sebab, bagi saya ialah kepentingan kajian ini menurut kajian awak sendiri.  Jadi bila kita buat huraian yang disini harus berkait rapat dengan kajian kita maknanya huraikan dari sudut mana pentingnya.  Jadi bila kita buat huraian kalau bagi saya kalau tidak ada rujukan pun tidak mengapa kerana huraian yang awak tulis dalam ini sudah cukup jelas untuk setiap satu betapa pentingnya tiap-tiap satu ini betapa pentingnya kajian ini kepada masyarakat ke kementerian sekolah, pelajar dan guru. Jumlah kepentingan ini biasanya ialah takkan kita nak letak satu kepentingan sahaja nampak sangat tak penting kajian ini. Jadi kita biasanya kita akan letaklah minima 3 maksima 5 ini biasalah kalau misalnya nak lebih dari 5 boleh aa tetapi kalau terlampau banyak sangat mungkin yang banyak itu dalam kategori yang sama aa jadi tidak perlulah kita nak letak banyak sangat  subtopik. Kita boleh cantumkan supaya ianya boleh menjadi satu. Hal ini kerana apabila terlalu banyak kadang-kadang sebagai pemeriksa kita lihat “okay kenapa ini sama dengan yang ini contoh okay ini sama dengan ini.. ini sama dengan itu kenapa awak perlu huraikan aaaa nak pecah-pecahkan dia pula”. Jadi kalau minima 3 okay jadi kita boleh kumpulkan. Jadi ingat ye bila buat penyusunan kepentingan kajian ini mestilah daripada besar. Masyarakat itu luas kecil, kecil, kecil, akhirnya individu ke pelajar, guru.

 

5. Importance of the Study (Chapter 1) #JomTulisTesis

Chapter 1, 1.6 Importance of the Study, okay the importance of this study we do have to aaaa tell or explain in more detail because here we are usually in the form of examiner, we have a section that shows what the importance of this study. If research is not important, why do we want to conduct research. So that is why there is importance that we conduct research. So for this section we will write using subtopics. So subtopics the importance of this study under which we have other subtopics. So this part aaaa we have to take ye if for example now our study on the textual discourse of the animated script of folklore, so this study is important because what, for whom, so we have to state. But in the importance of this study we have to explain according to from the big party first so if from this study we see it may be important to society. So we have to describe in the paragraph that community is big so when it is big we will describe it in one paragraph first. Then we shrink again 1.6.2 which is much smaller, aaaa for example the Ministry of Education or the Ministry of Education for example. So put this title means this study is important for this one. So explain below it, but make sure when we want to explain it we link back to our study, the meaning of our title is our study in which aspect from which angle is important. Then go down a little more maybe school from which angle, in which aspect the importance of this study. So is it important to errr to the teacher only the headmaster or the student so that is the other. So this one we can place students from big to small. So now the students in terms of which is important to describe a paragraph later which here may be from the teacher because the teacher needs to provide materials for Teaching and Learning (PNP). So we describe in terms of what, so this sometimes there are aaaa there are supervisors who state that every close description in this that you have explained for this subtopic should be supported by other scholarly studies or other studies. It can also be true as I say it depends on the supervisor because I repeat again that we supervisors all have Different skills of thought okay our thoughts are different so there may be a supervisor saying “okay you put support, you support for each other and why it is important to society, why it is important to the ministry, why schools, why students, why teachers ”. So there must be support, so like me if he describes near here the reason, for me is the importance of this study according to your own research. So when we make the description here should be closely related to our study it means explain from which angle it is important. So when we make a description, if for me if there is no reference it does not matter because the description you wrote in this is already clear enough for each one how important each one is how important this study is to the community to the ministry of schools, students and teachers. The total importance of this is usually that we do not want to place only one interest seems very insignificant this study. So we usually we will put a minimum of 3 to a maximum of 5 is normal if for example we want more than 5 can aa but if too many it is very possible that many are in the same category aa so there is no need for us to put a lot of very subtopics. We can put it together so that it can be one. This is because when there are too many sometimes as examiners we see "okay why is this the same as this example okay this is the same as this .. this is the same as that why you need to explain aaaa want to break him as well". So if a minimum of 3 is okay then we can collect. So remember that when compiling the importance of this study must be from large. The community is small, small, small, finally individual to students, teachers.

Pautan video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ybSmRq8m-RU 

Bukti subscribe:

Rujukan:

Normaliza Abd Rahim (2019). Jom Tulis Tesis!. Selangor: Penerbit Universiti Putra Malaysia

Kehadiran minggu 11: